Where these numbers come from

Cybercab Fleet Operator answers one question: if you bought a self-driving taxi and ran it as a business in your town for ninety days, what would happen to your bank account? It is a planning tool, not a prediction, and this page is the whole answer to "says who?"

Every figure below was read out of the numbers the game actually runs on, or out of the live research behind each city. None of it was typed in by hand, which is the only way a page like this stays true after the thing it describes changes.

Built 2026-09-14 from the register in this copy of the game and from the live city research. The page re-checks both when you open it, and says so below if either has moved on.

The honest split

The model runs on 184 numbers. Here is exactly how many of them anybody else can vouch for.

17
Published
9.2% of the 184
30
Worked out
16.3% of the 184
137
Ours
74.5% of the 184
17 — published figures. Somebody else published it and we are quoting it. The document and the date are on the number.
30 — worked out from published figures. Arithmetic on somebody else’s figures, with the arithmetic shown so you can check it instead of trusting it.
137 — our own estimates. Nobody published it, so it is our judgment. That is legitimate and we do not apologize for it — what is not acceptable is an estimate that cannot explain itself, so every one of them shows its reasoning.

Three quarters of it is ours. That is not a confession, it is the shape of the subject. Nobody has ever run a privately owned robotaxi, so there is no trade body publishing what one earns, what it costs to insure or how often it gets stuck. The alternative to an estimate here is not a fact — it is silence.

What we can promise instead is that every estimate is labeled as one, carries its reasoning, and can be replaced by yours. 144 of the 184 are editable inside the game, and changing one changes the model immediately.

A season in a metro runs on 114 of these; a season in a small town runs on all 184, because a town’s own geography — its radius, how far a fare goes, how fast the traffic moves — is on the list too. The register audits itself every time it loads: a published figure that carries no dated document, arithmetic with no working shown, or an estimate with no reasoning is a failure. It currently reports 0 failures.

What the 184 numbers are about

The same figures as the bar above, grouped by what they describe.

The car10 — 6 published, 3 worked out, 1 ours
The permit5 — 5 published
The deal you took9 — 3 worked out, 6 ours
The fares6 — 6 ours
Running costs7 — 7 ours
Cleaning5 — 5 ours
Premises9 — 9 ours
Electricity5 — 5 ours
A heat advisory5 — 5 ours
Running out of charge7 — 7 ours
Demand4 — 4 ours
The weather3 — 3 ours
People1 — 1 ours
Penalties3 — 3 ours
The rating16 — 16 ours
How often things go wrong13 — 13 ours
What the car is worth3 — 3 ours
The season3 — 3 ours
The town70 — 6 published, 24 worked out, 40 ours

The car itself is the best-documented thing in the subject and none of it is ours: battery, efficiency, motor, weight and seats come off one EPA certificate. The permit rules come off one Nevada Transportation Authority order. Those are also the two groups you cannot edit, because a certificate is not local knowledge.

How a town gets researched

21 towns and cities have been researched so far, and the same machine does every one of them. It runs in three passes, and the order matters.

1 · The free federal files, first

Anything the United States government already publishes for every city in the country is taken straight out of the national file. Nobody is asked, nothing is searched for, and there is no page that could be misread.

The town is matched to its row by a code, never by its name — a Census place or county FIPS number, an FAA airport identifier, or a coordinate. Names are how you end up with the wrong Springfield. Across the 21 towns, 879 of the 1,656 researched numbers came out of these files, from 123 distinct downloads shared between every town in a run.

2 · A language model, only for what is in no file

What is still researched is the LOCAL STORY, and it is researched because it is real, published and findable: the utility's time-of-use split (a filed tariff, not a table), public fast-charge prices, the visitor economy, the state's minimum liability statute, the city's own parking schedule, and the named demand generators -- hospitals with their bed counts, colleges with their enrolments, the venue that fills the town. That is the half of a pack no federal file will ever carry, and it is the half worth having: Dover, Tennessee is a town of 1,918 people in the federal files and nothing more, and what makes it interesting is that 84% of its rides are visitors to Fort Donelson National Battlefield.

3 · Every citation is fetched and read

Every record the model returned as 'sourced' had its cited URL fetched. The page had to load, and the figure had to be in its text within 400 characters of one of the record's own keywords. Anything that failed was demoted to 'estimated' with the failure written into its math.

Across the 21 towns 301 citations were checked. 210 passed. 91 failed and were demoted to labeled estimates, which is 30% of everything the model claimed to have a source for. A figure that loses its citation does not quietly stay a fact.

Where a demoted figure was feeding another one, the second is demoted too and says why. That happened ten times. 59 holes are written down across the six packs — things the research could not establish, recorded rather than papered over.

4 · The judgment that is left is drawn several times

Re-running the same research used to come back with materially different answers, and those answers drive the whole demand estimate. 5 of them were taken off the model altogether and are now computed from a pinned national survey and measured Census ratios. What judgment remains is asked 5 times and reported as the middle answer with its spread. Across all 63 of those figures the typical gap between the highest and lowest answer is 1.25 times, and the worst is 2.50 times. That is the honest width of the part of this that is judgment.

The cross-check: where we can be caught out, we let ourselves be

The demand estimate is the number everything else hangs off. Where somebody publishes a real trip count for a town, we build ours without looking at theirs and then put the two side by side. Where nobody publishes one, we say so and name the five places we looked.

Of the 21 towns researched: 1 had a published figure we landed close to, 2 had one we did not, 17 have no published figure at all, and 1 is a gap in our own work.

Alturas, CA none

single-radius town · population 2,634 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked the five places, in order. (1) State TNC/taxi authority: California has no Nevada-style taxicab authority; CPUC regulates TNCs. CPUC TNC Data Portal public 2021–2024 annual reports are suspended (D.25-10-062). CPUC Access for All 2026–27 NOFA, fees from Q3 2023 through Q2 2025, lists MODOC available funds as $— (zero), at $0.10 per completed TNC trip—consistent with essentially no originating TNC trips, but that is a fee ledger not a published trip total. PERB statewide TNC totals are California-wide, not Modoc. (2) City/county TNC permit reports and open data: City of Alturas business list has lodging, no taxi; Modoc County code index has no TNC trip table. (3) Airport ground transportation: Alturas Municipal (AAT) is general aviation, 1 nm west of downtown, no commercial enplanements or TNC pickup stats. (4) MPO/RTPA travel survey: MCTC 2024 SRTP (opened) inventories private providers (ABC Taxi Redding, Road Runner Yreka) and Sage Stage ridership, and does not publish a TNC or taxi trip count for Alturas. 2025 RTP is listed but was not a trip-count table. (5) Local reporting: no news story quoting a Modoc/Alturas taxi or TNC trip total; neighboring Plumas/Lassen/Butte announced Uber/Lyft only in November 2025, and Modoc was not included. Therefore value = 0 trips/year as the audited absence.

Our own estimate is 21 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Buffalo, NY none

multi-district metro · population 274,613 · researched 2026-09-13

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in this order. (1) State taxicab/TNC authority: NYS DMV licenses Uber and Lyft outside NYC and states that TNC records exist for audits; it publishes no Buffalo or Erie County trip counts. NYC TLC trip files are NYC-only. (2) City/county TNC or for-hire reports and OpenData Buffalo: transportation catalog shows AADT traffic counts and building permits; no taxi/TNC trip dataset. NYS TNC Act also bars local TNC trip taxes, so localities have little reason to tabulate trips. (3) Airport ground transportation: Uber operates at BUF with a designated rideshare pickup, and NFTA reports airport passenger volume, but no published TNC pickup/dropoff count was found on NFTA or airport pages opened this session. (4) MPO travel survey: GBNRTC/NFTA 2024 onboard survey reports ~62,000 average weekday transit boardings and that 53% of riders would take an Uber or taxi if transit vanished — a substitution share, not a TNC trip census. (5) Local reporting: 2017 launch stories and destination lists; no quoted official trip total. Unlike Nevada’s Taxicab Authority, New York does not publish upstate TNC trip totals.

Our own estimate is 13,661 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Chicago, IL agree

multi-district metro · population 2,731,585 · researched 2026-09-09

Published paid-ride count: 250,000 a day, published 2026-07. Our chain, built without ever seeing that figure, comes out at 235,615 a day — within 6% of it.

The published figure

Clifton, AZ none

single-radius town · population 3,752 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in the required order: (1) Arizona ADOT Vehicle-for-Hire / TNC program — statewide permits only, no county or city trip PDFs; (2) Town of Clifton and Greenlee County — no TNC/for-hire open-data portal or permit trip reports; (3) Airport — Greenlee County Airport (CFT) is general aviation with no commercial passenger service and no TNC pickup stats; PHX Sky Harbor TNC totals are Phoenix, ~200 miles away; (4) SEAGO, the regional COG — transit coordination studies document no public transit in Greenlee, not TNC trips, and no household travel survey with paid-ride counts; (5) Local reporting — no news story quoting a taxi or TNC trip total for Clifton or Greenlee. Absence is audit-able; it is not a finding that zero paid rides occur.

Our own estimate is 14 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Cody, WY none

single-radius town · population 10,377 · researched 2026-09-11

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in order: (1) State taxicab/TNC authority — Wyoming has no Nevada-style taxicab authority. TNCs are governed exclusively by W.S. 31-20 (local governments may not license or tax TNC trips). The Wyoming Public Service Commission annual reports cover electric, gas, water, pipelines, and telecom, not taxis or TNCs (psc.wyo.gov utility annual reports). WYDOT publishes AADT, not for-hire trips. (2) City/county TNC or for-hire permit reports — searched codywy.gov; no trip census. Closest local number is the City Tipsy Taxi voucher program: Town Taxi alone averaged 30–35 vouchers/month (about 50 in summer) as of 2022, which is a drunk-ride subsidy for one company, not all paid rides. (3) Airport ground transportation — Yellowstone Regional Airport publishes enplanements (37,033 in 2024) but no TNC/taxi pickup counts; Lyft's Wyoming airport list omits COD entirely; Uber's COD pickup page has no volumes. (4) MPO travel survey — no MPO; the 2016 Park County Transit Feasibility Study is about whether to start a bus, not a paid-ride count. (5) Local reporting quoting any of the above — Cowboy State Daily (Cody Cab driver Earl Farlow, Jun 2025) and Northern Wyoming News (Tipsy Taxi, 2022) name operators but give no aggregate trip total. Absence is therefore audited, not assumed.

Our own estimate is 169 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Colorado Springs, CO none

multi-district metro · population 494,743 · researched 2026-09-13

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked the five places in order. (1) Colorado PUC: statewide TNC volume is published (approximately 37 million rides in 2025) but with no city breakout; Large-Market Taxicab operating trip counts stopped being required after 2019, so the 6020 annual reports no longer give Colorado Springs taxi trips. (2) City/county TNC permit reports and open data: data.coloradosprings.gov catalog home has no TNC or taxi trip dataset; the city does not publish for-hire trip totals. (3) Airport: COS monthly traffic releases (e.g. December 2025) count passengers (2,448,001 in 2025) not TNC pickups; ground-transportation rules say a clearinghouse logs TNC geo-fence trips for the airport but that report is not posted. The last published airport TNC figure is a 2018 Gazette share (TNCs carried 43.2% of departing airport passengers in Q1 2018), which is a share, not a trip count. (4) PPACG: the 2050 LRTP public survey reports 94% drive-alone and 8% weekly transit use and does not publish TNC trip counts. (5) Local reporting: 2018 Gazette/PUC clips give zTrip taxi journeys of 297,569 in 2017 (taxi-only, one company, nine years stale). CDOT’s 2019 study modeled 3,680 TNC person trips/day for PPACG in 2018 — a model, not a reported count. None of those is a current all-paid-rides total for this city, so the record is 0.

Our own estimate is 18,346 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Columbia, MO none

single-radius town · population 130,851 · researched 2026-09-12

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked, in order: (1) STATE — Missouri DOR licenses TNCs under RSMo 387.400–387.440; RSMo 387.440 lets only Kansas City and the St. Louis regional taxicab commission inspect a sample of TNC records, and those records are confidential. No statewide TNC/taxi trip PDF exists for Columbia or Boone County. (2) CITY/COUNTY — Columbia Finance licenses taxicabs at $25/vehicle and requires driver manifests (Chapter 28) but publishes no trip totals; the open-data portal is building permits, not for-hire trips; CATSO 2055 MTP says Uber and Lyft are well-established and six taxi companies operated as of 2024, with no counts. (3) AIRPORT — flycou.com publishes monthly enplanements/deplanements (247,068 combined YTD through August 2026) and lodging-tax receipts, not TNC or taxi pickups; Uber documents a FIFO queue at COU with no volume. (4) MPO — CATSO 2055 MTP and its 2024 household survey asked how often rideshare is a primary mode (327 responses) but did not publish a TNC trip total; commute tables mix taxi with motorcycle/other. (5) LOCAL REPORTING — ABC 17 (Sept 2026), KOMU (Oct 2025 downtown stands), and KBIA/Missourian (Mar 2026 Lyft St. Patrick’s promo) quote Uber and Lyft operations and stand hours, never a trip count. Absence is audited, not assumed.

Our own estimate is 1,781 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Dover, TN none

single-radius town · population 1,918 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in the required order: (1) Tennessee has no state taxicab/TNC authority publishing trip totals (Dept. of Safety issues for-hire endorsements only; Nashville TLC covers Metro Nashville, not Stewart). (2) City of Dover and Stewart County publish no TNC/for-hire permit reports or open-data trip files. (3) Clarksville Outlaw Field (CKV) lists Uber/Lyft availability but no ground-transport pickup counts; BNA is ~70 miles away. (4) Clarksville Urbanized Area MPO notes Uber/Lyft operate in the Clarksville MPA but gives no trip volumes; Dover is outside that urbanized area; GNRC (Nashville) likewise has none for Stewart. (5) No local news story quoting any of the above. Absence is therefore documented rather than assumed.

Our own estimate is 32 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Ely, NV none

single-radius town · population 3,946 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked the five required places: (1) Nevada Taxicab Authority monthly PDFs are Clark County (Las Vegas) only — March 2026 industry total is 1,234,250 trips there, nothing for White Pine; (2) City of Ely / White Pine County and NTA certificate lists show Elko Taxi CPCN 1046.2 covering White Pine but in Temporary Discontinuance, with no trip reports posted; (3) Ely Airport Yelland Field lost commercial service in 2013 and airport-board minutes count aircraft ops, not TNC pickups; (4) no MPO travel survey for this county — NDOT lists Ely Bus as rural transit only; (5) Ely Times / Ely Echo / tourism-board minutes searched, no quoted taxi or TNC volume. Result: nothing to source.

Our own estimate is 122 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Las Vegas, NV disagree

multi-district metro · population 679,817 · researched 2026-09-09

Reported taxi trips (cross-check): 35,616 a day, published 2025-12. Our chain, built without ever seeing that figure, comes out at 93,874 a day2.6 times theirs.

The published figure

We do not hide this one. The two disagree, the pack records it as a hole, and the demand estimate for this city should be read as an order of magnitude and nothing finer.

Malta, MT none

single-radius town · population 1,846 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in order: (1) Montana PSC motor-carrier pages and the statewide authority list—Rasier-MT (Uber) and Lyft hold Class E certificates for all points in Montana, but PSC publishes no trip counts by city or county and motor-carrier annual reports are revenue, not trips; no Malta taxi certificate identified. (2) City of Malta and Phillips County—no TNC/for-hire permit reports or open-data trip portal. (3) Malta Airport (M75) is general aviation with no TNC pickup stats; nearest commercial airport Glasgow GGW’s master plan counts air-taxi operations and Valley County Transit, not TNC pickups. (4) No metropolitan planning organization covers Phillips County (rural Non-UZA). (5) Phillips County News covers Phillips Transit ridership anecdotally but quotes no taxi or TNC trip totals.

Our own estimate is 8 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Nashville, TN disagree

multi-district metro · population 721,074 · researched 2026-09-13

Published paid-ride count (cross-check): 10,110 a day, published 2025-08. Our chain, built without ever seeing that figure, comes out at 38,187 a day3.8 times theirs.

The published figure

We do not hide this one. The two disagree, the pack records it as a hole, and the demand estimate for this city should be read as an order of magnitude and nothing finer.

Presidio, TX none

single-radius town · population 2,909 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in order: (1) Texas TDLR TNC licensee list (https://www.tdlr.texas.gov/tnc/search) — statewide Uber/Lyft licenses only, no city trip counts; Texas has no Nevada-style taxicab authority publishing volumes. (2) City of Presidio and Presidio County sites — no TNC/for-hire permit reports or open-data trip files (Occupations Code ch. 2402 preempts local TNC regulation). (3) Presidio Lely International Airport — no published TNC pickup statistics (general-aviation field). (4) No MPO household travel survey covering Presidio TNC trips (rural, not in an urbanized MPO). (5) Local reporting (Big Bend Sentinel and related searches) — no quoted taxi or TNC trip counts.

Our own estimate is 12 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Quincy, IL not asked

single-radius town · population 38,918 · researched 2026-09-09

This is a hole in our own work, not a finding about the town. The research never came back with a "published trip count" record at all, so we do not even know whether one exists. It was never asked, and we are not going to dress that up as "there is no figure".

the research returned no rides_reported record, so nothing is known about whether a published figure exists -- this is a hole in the pack, not a finding about the city

Our estimate of 450 rides a day is therefore unchecked.

San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA none

multi-district metro · population 109,914 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in required order: (1) California CPUC TNC Data Portal—statewide annual reports exist but no Ventura or Ventura County trip totals are public (recent public versions suspended/redacted). (2) City of Ventura and Ventura County open-data/permit pages—no TNC or for-hire trip-count reports. (3) Oxnard Airport (nearest commercial field) and other county airports—Uber/Lyft permitted but no published ground-transportation TNC pickup statistics. (4) VCTC (MPO) travel-model and performance documents—no TNC trip counts. (5) Local news and operator sites—no quoted taxi or TNC volume figures. Absence is therefore documented rather than silent.

Our own estimate is 1,206 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Sarasota, FL none

multi-district metro · population 58,458 · researched 2026-09-12

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in the required order. (1) State taxicab/TNC authority: Florida has no Nevada-style taxicab authority. Fla. Stat. 627.748(17) preempts counties and cities from licensing TNCs or imposing operational reporting; TNCs are 'governed exclusively by state law.' FDOT's Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged Annual Operating Report does list 5,671 TNC trips in Sarasota County in FY 2023/24 — those are coordinated paratransit/TD trips, not commercial Uber/Lyft, so they are not a market total. (2) City/county TNC permit reports and open data: the City deregulated for-hire service and, given the preemption, publishes no TNC trip file; Sarasota County open data has bus routes, not TNC pickups. (3) Airport ground transportation: FlySRQ's statistics page and 2023–2025 Annual Activity Report publish aircraft operations and 4,514,781 airline passengers in calendar 2025, not TNC pickup counts. The ground-transportation page confirms Uber and Lyft staging but gives no volumes. (4) MPO: Sarasota/Manatee MPO LRTP surveys note that under-45 respondents use taxi/Uber/Lyft more than older residents; no trip total. (5) Local reporting quotes Visit Sarasota visitor counts and SRQ passengers, not paid-ride counts. Absence is structural (preemption), not a missed PDF.

Our own estimate is 4,183 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Scott City, KS none

single-radius town · population 3,855 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked the five required places: (1) State taxicab/TNC authority — Kansas TNC Act (K.S.A. 8-2703) says TNCs are not motor carriers or taxicabs, and Kansas Corporation Commission transportation dockets are carrier-enforcement orders, not trip tallies; no Kansas TNC rides report found. (2) City/county TNC or for-hire permit reports and open data — Scott City code is the Standard Traffic Ordinance; no taxi/TNC trip file. (3) Airport ground transportation — Garden City Regional Airport (36 miles south) publishes commercial enplanements, not TNC pickups; Scott City Municipal (KTQK) has no GT stats. (4) MPO travel survey — no MPO covers rural Scott County. (5) Local reporting quoting any of the above — none found. ACS for this place already counts 0.0 of workers commuting by taxi or ride-hail.

Our own estimate is 21 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Stillwater, OK none

single-radius town · population 50,046 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked the five required places. (1) State taxicab/TNC authority: Oklahoma Corporation Commission Transportation Network Companies page (oklahoma.gov/occ/divisions/transportation/transportation-network-companies.html, modified 2026-07-29) is permits and the 2015 TNC Act only — no trip totals; Passenger Carriers page likewise has licenses, not counts; TNC ride records are kept confidential under 47 O.S. §1029/§1013. (2) City/county TNC or for-hire reports: stillwaterok.gov has sales/visitor-tax PDFs and no TNC/taxi trip report; TNCs are exclusive OCC jurisdiction so the city does not permit them; 2022 traffic-citation tables mention taxi-license display, not trip volume. (3) Airport ground transportation: Stillwater Regional Airport (stillwaterok.gov/157/Airport and flystillwaterok.com) publishes no TNC pickup counts. (4) MPO/RTPO travel survey: Stillwater is not in ACOG (OKC MPO); CORTPO/ODOT Payne County LRTP and the Payne County survey have mode comments but no TNC or taxi trip totals. (5) Local reporting: O'Colly, The Stillwegian, and The Oklahoman quote visitor spending and event crowds, not taxi/TNC trips. Value 0 means no published count was found, not that zero rides occur.

Our own estimate is 491 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Wichita, KS none

multi-district metro · population 400,987 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked the five required places: (1) State taxicab/TNC authority — Kansas TNC Act (K.S.A. 8-2701 et seq.) makes TNCs keep trip records but does not publish them; K.S.A. 8-2703 excludes TNCs from motor-carrier/taxicab status, and searches of the Kansas Corporation Commission Transportation Division (kcc.ks.gov motor-carrier/KTRAN material) returned no Uber/Lyft or taxi trip counts. (2) City/county TNC or for-hire reports and open data — Wichita licenses taxis under Code Ch. 3.84 and lists Uber/Lyft at wichita.gov/1506/Charter-Services-Taxicabs; searches of city open data found traffic citations, not TNC trips; no Sedgwick County for-hire trip report. (3) Airport ground transportation — flywichita.com publishes 2025 passenger totals (more than 1.8 million passengers; 935,512 enplanements) and lists Uber, Lyft, and American Cab on the ground-transportation page, but no TNC pickup or dropoff counts. (4) MPO travel survey — WAMPO’s public-transit page and plans have bus hours and a 2011 household travel survey of all-mode trips, not TNC counts. (5) Local reporting — Wichita Eagle, KSN, and KWCH quote transit ridership and 7 million visitors, not Uber/Lyft/taxi trip totals. Value 0 is an audited absence.

Our own estimate is 6,152 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Winner, SD none

single-radius town · population 2,969 · researched 2026-09-09

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in order: (1) South Dakota has no taxicab authority that publishes trip counts (TNCs register with DPS under state law; no monthly PDF like Nevada's); (2) City of Winner has a taxi-cab license chapter but no TNC/for-hire trip reports or open-data portal; Tripp County likewise publishes none; (3) Winner Regional Airport (ICR) is general aviation with 5 CY2025 enplanements and no ground-transportation TNC pickup stats; (4) there is no metropolitan planning organization or household travel survey for Winner/Tripp; (5) local news and the Winner Area Chamber do not quote a taxi or TNC trip figure. SDDOT's FY2024 transit book reports ROCS system-wide demand-response rides (86,903 across many counties including Tripp) which are public transit, not paid taxi/TNC, so they are not used here.

Our own estimate is 26 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

Worland, WY none

single-radius town · population 4,730 · researched 2026-09-11

Nobody publishes a trip count for this town. We say so, and we name what was searched rather than leaving "no data" to mean "we did not look".

Checked in the required order: (1) State taxicab/TNC authority — Wyoming has no Nevada-style taxicab authority. TNCs are governed exclusively by W.S. 31-20; WYDOT publishes AADT/VMT and statewide transit-trip totals (1.757 million unlinked transit trips FY25), not TNC or taxi trip counts for Worland. (2) City/county TNC or for-hire reports — City of Worland repealed Chapter 21 taxicab licensing (Ordinance 867, effective 2023-04-15) as no longer viable; no TNC permit series or open-data trip file. (3) Airport ground transportation — Worland Municipal (WRL) has had no scheduled airline since Great Lakes left in 2016; Lyft’s Wyoming permitted-airport list is CPR, CYS, JAC, LAR only — not WRL; no TNC pickup counts. (4) MPO travel survey — no MPO covers Washakie County (Cheyenne and Casper MPOs do not). (5) Local reporting — Northern Wyoming News covers Van-Go but quotes no annual TNC/taxi trip total. FTA NTD rural reporter line for ‘Washakie County Senior Citizens Center, dba: Worland Van-Go Public Transportation’ shows 8,173 unlinked passenger trips in 2023 (demand-response transit, not TNC).

Our own estimate is 25 rides a day, and it stands on its own arithmetic with nothing to check it against.

What we know is weak

A methodology page that only lists strengths is marketing. These are the four places where, if this tool is wrong for your town, it is most likely wrong here.

Insurance has no anchor at all

Insurance, first car, $340 a month. In the register’s own words:

Nobody publishes a premium for a driverless for-hire vehicle owned by an individual — the product barely exists yet. $340 a month is our estimate, set above a private policy on the same car and below a full commercial taxi book, because the exposure is commercial but there is no driver to rate. If you have a real quote in your town, this is one of the numbers most worth replacing.

There is no published premium anywhere in this. It is bracketed between two things we do know and nothing more.

The depot rent was sized against the game, not a lease

Leased bay, Sunset Rd — rent, $850 a month. In the register’s own words:

Ours. We did not fetch a Las Vegas commercial lease rate and we are not going to imply we did. $850 a month is sized against the game rather than the market: it is about one and a half times a car’s monthly loan payment, so taking the bay is very nearly the same commitment as taking on another car — which is exactly the decision it should feel like. If you know what a bay costs in your town, that number is better than ours.

That is a game-design decision wearing a dollar sign, and it says so on its own card.

One Quincy figure is doing the work in every town

How much of an online driver’s time is on a ride: 45%. It decides how many cars are already online competing for the work, and therefore how much of it reaches yours. No researched pack overrides it, so the same estimate is running in all 21 towns.

Ours, and after the fare it is the number your result is most sensitive to. Nobody publishes utilisation for a town this size. Big-city TNC studies put time-with-a-passenger somewhere around half; a thin small-town market is worse, because the gaps between fares are longer. We use 45%. It matters because the model works backwards from it: fares a day, times the car-minutes each one takes, divided by this, gives the car-hours of supply the town must be carrying — and your share is one car among that. Put it at 25% and there are far more cars online and you get much less work; put it at 70% and there are fewer and you get more.

We measured what it is worth. Replaying 24 fixed-seed ninety-day seasons, a season that finishes $10,079 better off on our 45% finishes $5,623 at 25% (44% worse) and $12,838 at 70% (27% better). One number nobody publishes moves the answer by about half. Run node _town.js sens and you get the same table.

The judgment that is left still wobbles

The demand figures a language model is still asked for are drawn 5 times each. Across all 63 of them the typical highest-to-lowest gap between identical runs is 1.25 times, and the worst is 2.50 times. Taking 5 variables off the model and computing them instead is what brought it down to that; it did not bring it to zero, and pretending otherwise would be the easiest lie on this page.

Every number is editable. Change these first.

Open Every number behind this game inside the game, tap any figure, and type your own. It goes into the model straight away and stays in your browser. Nothing is sent anywhere — and if you then put a season on the board, it goes up marked as run on custom numbers, because a season played on different figures is not comparable with one that was not.

These 5 are the ones whose own reasoning admits that a figure you know beats ours:

Insurance, first car

Running costs · currently $340 a month

If you have a real quote in your town, this is one of the numbers most worth replacing.

Leased bay, Sunset Rd — rent

Premises · currently $850 a month

If you know what a bay costs in your town, that number is better than ours.

The furthest a fare goes

The town · currently 14 miles

If you know the roads out of Quincy, this is a number worth arguing with.

Fares a day in the whole town

The town · currently 420 rides/day

If you know Quincy, the visitor count is the first thing to change.

Hired rides one visiting party takes

The town · currently 0.407 trips a visit

If you know the town, change it here first.

That list is not hand-picked. It is every editable record whose reasoning contains "most worth replacing", "better than ours", "change it here" or "if you know" — matched against the register when this page was built.

What one town costs to research

Between $0.00 and $5.30, measured on the run that actually produced each pack. All 21 together came to $57.30.

Alturas, CA single-radius town$0.00
Buffalo, NY multi-district metro$0.00
Cody, WY single-radius town$0.00
Colorado Springs, CO multi-district metro$0.00
Columbia, MO single-radius town$0.00
Nashville, TN multi-district metro$0.00
Sarasota, FL multi-district metro$0.00
Stillwater, OK single-radius town$0.00
Worland, WY single-radius town$0.00
Las Vegas, NV multi-district metro$3.97
Clifton, AZ single-radius town$4.01
Dover, TN single-radius town$4.15
Quincy, IL single-radius town$4.74
Ely, NV single-radius town$4.77
San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA multi-district metro$4.78
Wichita, KS multi-district metro$4.93
Winner, SD single-radius town$5.06
Chicago, IL multi-district metro$5.17
Malta, MT single-radius town$5.17
Scott City, KS single-radius town$5.25
Presidio, TX single-radius town$5.30
All 21$57.30

190 model calls and 1,270 web searches across the 21, and about 488 minutes of wall clock across the 20 that recorded it. The federal files are free and are downloaded once and shared, so most of that money buys the things no national file carries: the local electricity tariff, what a detailer charges, what a bay rents for, and who fills the town on a Saturday.

measured when the research actually ran on 2026-09-09; rebuilding the pack from the saved answers costs nothing

What this page is not claiming

The game is not a forecast of Las Vegas, Quincy or anywhere else. The fares, the network’s cut, the settlement lag, the loan terms, the insurance, the cleaning prices, the depot rents, the wear per mile, the penalties, how often things go wrong, and every curve describing how a district answers heat or rain — those are ours. They are tuned to make the decisions interesting. Do not quote them at anybody.

Tesla has published no Robotaxi fare table, no owner-operator revenue share and no Cybercab price. The only price on the record is Musk’s October 2024 "below $30,000". The widely repeated "$25,000" is not sourced to Tesla and this game does not use it. Nobody is running a privately owned Cybercab anywhere today; the premise is fiction built on a real statement.

Inside the game, 23 constants are tagged sourced and name their document, 4 are arithmetic on those, 3 are stated as approximate geography, and the rest are tagged ours in the source code itself. The simulation is version 1.5.0.

Play it — ninety days, no account, nothing to installThe ladder — does one car pay for itself, town by townSee all 184 numbers, and change any of themThe board — every season anyone has submitted